Evidaxis
Dated record

ccg-workflow

repo · ccg-workflow · paper: not linked · as of

Niche: not yet assigned.

2.4 commits per week averaged over the trailing window. No paper is linked in OpenAlex. Dependents: no reading captured in the partition. 5,977 GitHub stars, recorded, not scored. Measured for ccg-workflow as of 2026-11-07; sources: GitHub, OpenAlex and deps.dev where linked.

commits/wk 2.4 averaged, trailing window last commit week 2026-11-01 measured · GitHub ·
citations no paper linked all years, indexed to date no reading · OpenAlex ·
direct dependents not captured this week weekly axis input; partition 2026-11-07 no reading · deps.dev snapshot ·
stars 5,977 recorded, not scored measured · GitHub ·
Download values (CSV) JSON record Follow this system (feed) Report an error

Is ccg-workflow still maintained?

2.4 commits per week averaged over the trailing window.

GitHub averaged 2.4 per week over the trailing window; raw weekly counts below are individual weeks.

Last commit week 2026-11-01.

Commits in the latest captured week vs 4 weeks earlier: 1 · vs 26 weeks earlier: 1 · 52-week range: 0 to 76 commits in an individual week.

line chart: ccg-workflow, weekly commits, 1 in latest week, 2025-11-09 to 2026-11-01
ccg-workflow averaged 2.4 commits a week. GitHub commit_activity · .
Latest eight weeks
Week startingCommits
2026-09-135
2026-09-200
2026-09-270
2026-10-040
2026-10-113
2026-10-182
2026-10-250
2026-11-011
heatmap chart: ccg-workflow, weeks with commits, 18 of 26, 2026-05-10 to 2026-11-01
18 of the last 26 captured weeks had commits for ccg-workflow. GitHub commit_activity · .
All 52 weeks
Weekly commits
Week startingCommits
2025-11-090
2025-11-160
2025-11-230
2025-11-300
2025-12-070
2025-12-140
2025-12-210
2025-12-280
2026-01-0476
2026-01-1127
2026-01-1812
2026-01-256
2026-02-016
2026-02-086
2026-02-150
2026-02-224
2026-03-015
2026-03-0837
2026-03-1518
2026-03-2222
2026-03-2913
2026-04-056
2026-04-120
2026-04-193
2026-04-260
2026-05-030
2026-05-105
2026-05-1711
2026-05-242
2026-05-312
2026-06-072
2026-06-141
2026-06-214
2026-06-284
2026-07-058
2026-07-126
2026-07-190
2026-07-260
2026-08-020
2026-08-092
2026-08-161
2026-08-2316
2026-08-301
2026-09-060
2026-09-135
2026-09-200
2026-09-270
2026-10-040
2026-10-113
2026-10-182
2026-10-250
2026-11-011

GitHub commit_activity · period 2025-11-09 to 2026-11-01 · n = 52 weeks · method weekly totals; reconstructed dates · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1 · CSV

Readings

Recorded values and sources
ReadingValueΔ 4 weeksΔ 26 weeks52-week rangeInstrumentDateReproducePrevious reading
Commits per week2.40.3-6.62.1 to 18.2GitHub, trailing 12 weeks2026-11-07Public query2.5
Citing worksno readingno readingno readingno readingOpenAlex, all years2026-11-07Public queryno reading
Weekly direct dependentsno readingno readingno readingno readingWeekly direct dependents2026-11-07Public queryno reading
Daily package dependents (unscored)0no readingno reading0 to 0deps.dev REST, unscored2026-11-06Public query0
Stars5,97737no reading5,914 to 5,977GitHub stars, unscored2026-11-07Public query5,956

Evidaxis snapshot · period 2026-11-07 · n = 1 system · method source linked readings · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1

How to cite ccg-workflow's record?

Evidaxis. ccg-workflow measurement record. Snapshot 2026-11-07. urn:evidaxis:claim:e_VS4T6QF8CRA:m5:2026-11-07. CC0-1.0. https://evidaxis.org/e/e_VS4T6QF8CRA/

Evidaxis · period 2026-11-07 · n = 1 system · method claim URN · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1

Is anyone using ccg-workflow?

Dependents: no reading captured in the partition.

Weekly dependents
PartitionDirect dependentsWeekly pointsMethod
no partitionno reading0m5 own packages

deps.dev weekly direct dependents of the system's own packages. A package counts when it is declared in the system's own tree, published under that name and not attributed by deps.dev to another repository. Partition dates can repeat across snapshots. Package linkage is not uniformly verified: packages with no repository metadata (no_link) are unverified and remain admitted.

Daily package dependents (unscored): 0; captured 2026-11-06; package: npm/ccg-workflow. deps.dev REST count for one identity-verified pinned package, captured daily and never scored. Its package scope differs from the weekly package union; neither value replaces the other. 5,977 GitHub stars, recorded, not scored.

sparkline chart: ccg-workflow, daily dependents, 0, 2026-w39 to 2026-w45
ccg-workflow recorded 0 daily dependents. deps.dev REST (unscored) · .
Captured daily series
Unscored daily dependents, as captured
PeriodDependents
2026-w390
2026-w400
2026-w410
2026-w420
2026-w430
2026-w440
2026-w450

deps.dev · period 2026-11-07 · n = 0 partitions · method m5 own packages · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1 · CSV

What changed since the last snapshot?

2 published readings changed between snapshots d1eb0cec0f6a and 868e3c39d9c7.

slope chart: ccg-workflow, changed published values, 2, 2026-10-31 to 2026-11-07
2 published values changed for ccg-workflow since 2026-10-31. Evidaxis snapshots · .
Snapshot values
MetricPreviousCurrentDelta
Commits per week2.52.4-0.1
Citing worksno readingno readingno reading
Weekly direct dependentsno readingno readingno reading
Stars5,9565,97721

Evidaxis snapshots · period 2026-10-31 to 2026-11-07 · n = 7 partitions · method paired snapshot values · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1 · History CSV

Take the data or follow changes

Values and captured history are available under CC0-1.0. The system feed records changes to published numbers.

Values CSVHistory CSVJSON recordAtom feedJSON FeedAdd Evidaxis as a preferred source on GoogleReport an error

Evidaxis · period 2026-11-07 · n = 1 system · method CC0-1.0 open export · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1

For teams tracking many systems

Use the cohort CSV, snapshot archive and membership manifest to reproduce observations across systems.

Cohort CSV · Snapshot archive · Membership manifest

Paper and links

Source records identify the system, repository and linked works; no paper authors are published.

    What is not measured for ccg-workflow, and why

    Missing readings describe instrument coverage. A missing value is not a measured zero.

    Unmeasured slots
    ReadingReason
    Citing worksnot linked
    Weekly direct dependentsno partition

    Dependents: no reading captured in the partition.

    Gate ETA: never published; Evidaxis makes no public actionable prediction.

    Dependents ecosystem composition: no reading; this field is not present in the snapshot.

    Evidaxis · period 2026-11-07 · n = 1 system · method measurement coverage · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1

    Measurement detail

    Gate, gauges, percentile, derived signals and snapshot receipt

    History: 7 weekly observations; minimum 4. Axis coverage: 1 of 3 axes measurable. Gate: not computable - 1 of 3 axes measurable

    Gate: not computable - 1 of 3 axes measurable

    ccg-workflow

    repo
    Unassigned (AI-v1 census) · n = 6545 · ccg-workflow
    1 of 3 axes measurable · conf low
    convergence gate
    Convergence gate: Gate: not computable - 1 of 3 axes measurable Development velocity: measured × Citation momentum: not measurable ∅ Direct-dependents momentum (deps.dev): not measurable ∅
    gate
    0 of 3 axes

    Gate: not computable - 1 of 3 axes measurable

    · Evidaxis snapshot · 2026-11-07
    Gate: not computable - 1 of 3 axes measurable
    position in cohort distribution one of 6545 in cohort
    percentile 1 within cohort p25 p50 p75 p0 p100
    percentile
    p1
    · Evidaxis snapshot · 2026-11-07
    momentum averages present-axis z-scores; two- and three-axis scores are not strictly comparable
    velocity z
    velocity z gaugevelocity z-3.10 within cohort, log-slope -0.047/wk.0-3.10
    velocity z
    -3.10 σ
    slope
    -0.047/wk
    · Evidaxis snapshot · 2026-11-07
    log-slope -0.047/wk
    citation z Citation source: not measured.
    direct-dependents z Direct-dependents axis: minimum of 14 usable points of the new quantity and 5 latest dependents not met.
    cohort
    6545
    systems measured
    weekly commits
    2.4
    Development velocity axis: measured.
    total citations
    no reading
    Citation source: not measured.
    momentum
    11.2
    percentile p1
    commit heatmap, last 26 weeks2.4/wk
    weekly commits, 26 weeks26 weeks of commits, peak 16 in a week, 18 active weeks, 76 total.week 1: 5 commitsweek 2: 11 commitsweek 3: 2 commitsweek 4: 2 commitsweek 5: 2 commitsweek 6: 1 commitsweek 7: 4 commitsweek 8: 4 commitsweek 9: 8 commitsweek 10: 6 commitsweek 11: 0 commitsweek 12: 0 commitsweek 13: 0 commitsweek 14: 2 commitsweek 15: 1 commitsweek 16: 16 commitsweek 17: 1 commitsweek 18: 0 commitsweek 19: 5 commitsweek 20: 0 commitsweek 21: 0 commitsweek 22: 0 commitsweek 23: 3 commitsweek 24: 2 commitsweek 25: 0 commitsweek 26: 1 commits
    weeks
    26
    peak/wk
    16
    active
    18
    total
    76
    · Evidaxis snapshot · 2026-11-07
    citations by yearCitation source: not measured.
    Daily dependents count (unscored) 0 dependents 0 direct · npm/ccg-workflow · deps.dev · the scored m5 axis uses weekly partitions
    recency-weighted swing trailing 13-week vs prior 39-week log-slope ratio -12.98, regime recent slope sign differs from prior window. prior slope +0.005, recent slope -0.069 per week. +0.005prior 39w-0.069recent 13w-12.98×
    swing
    -12.98×
    regime
    recent slope sign differs from prior window
    windows
    13w vs 39w
    snapshot 1 of 1 · · m5
    commit-axis Sharpe log-linear slope over residual std, value -0.008 with 95% CI -0.039 to +0.022, 50 degrees of freedom. CI spans zero.0-0.00895% CI -0.039, +0.022-0.039+0.022
    sharpe
    -0.008
    95% ci
    -0.039, +0.022
    dof
    50
    snapshot 1 of 1 · · m5
    commit changepoint52 weekly commit points. No significant changepoint detected (|delta slope| within the noise floor).no significant changepoint
    changepoint
    none detected
    snapshot 1 of 1 · · m5
    code-leads-citation lag reserved

    reserved: citation series too short / axis absent for cross-correlation

    status
    reserved
    value
    insufficient data
    snapshot 1 of 1 · · m5
    axis alpha vs cohort reserved

    reserved: cohort N too small for regression (power ~0)

    status
    reserved
    value
    insufficient data
    snapshot 1 of 1 · · m5
    methodology gate snapshot 1 of 1 · · m5
    commit weeks
    52
    citation years
    0
    shipped
    3
    reserved
    3

    shipped

    • recency-swing
    • commit-sharpe
    • commit-changepoint

    reserved

    • code-leads-citation-lag
    • axis-alpha
    • gate-eta
    snapshot 7 of 7 · · m5

    Direct-dependents momentum (deps.dev)

    Direct-dependents axis: minimum of 14 usable points of the new quantity and 5 latest dependents not met.

    Coverage state
    below_floor
    Cohort z
    no axis
    OLS slope
    no reading
    Theil-Sen slope
    no reading
    Latest direct dependents
    no reading
    Confirmed-clean points
    0
    Reconstructed history points
    no reading
    As-of partition
    no reading
    Fragility veto
    no reading
    Rising vote
    no

    Source: deps.dev (Google), CC-BY 4.0. Modified: aggregated to system-level counts and momentum scores.

    Axis definition · Snapshot axis correlations

    Evidaxis · period 2026-11-07 · n = 1 system · method measurement detail · updated · version 868e3c39d9c7-b1 · record JSON · snapshot receipt